Legal Opinion
State v. Templeton
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 9, 2001No. Nos. 45384-0-I; 45386-6-I; 45387-4-I; 45969-4-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.
CrRLJ 3.1 provides that the right to counsel accrues “as soon as feasible” after arrest. We are asked to decide whether the Supreme Court exceeded its powers in enacting the rule. We hold the court did not exceed its powers, the rule is valid, and the results of the breath tests in these cases were properly suppressed.
*144I
Four cases are consolidated in this discretionary review. Each Respondent was stopped by a State Patrol officer, arrested for driving under the influence (DUI), given Miranda1 warnings, and transported to the police department. Each was advised of the right to talk to an…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Dean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. TempletonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.