Legal Opinion
State v. Templeton
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 9, 2001No. 45384-0-I, 45386-6-I, 45387-4-I, 45969-4-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
27 P.3d 222 (2001)
107 Wash.App. 141
STATE of Washington, Petitioner,
v.
John D. TEMPLETON, Benjamin Marginean, James Marsh and Richard Post, Respondents.
Nos. 45384-0-I, 45386-6-I, 45387-4-I, 45969-4-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
July 9, 2001.
Ann Marie Summers, King County Pros. Ofc., Seattle, for Appellant.
William A. Bowman, Bellevue, Joseph Schlosser, Kirkland, Kay Lee, Poulsbo, Jon Fox, Bellevue, for Respondents.
ELLINGTON, J.
CrRLJ 3.1 provides that the right to counsel accrues "as soon as feasible" after arrest. We are asked to decide whether the Supreme Court exceeded its…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Dean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002