Legal Opinion

State v. Rashid

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 19, 2021No. 20190682-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

2021 UT App 17

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. AHMED HAWKEN RASHID, Appellant. Opinion No. 20190682-CA Filed February 19, 2021 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Amber M. Mettler No. 181909592 Melinda Dee, Attorney for Appellant Simarjit S. Gill and Hyrum J. Hemingway, Attorneys for Appellee JUDGE GREGORY K. ORME authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER and RYAN M. HARRIS concurred. ORME, Judge: ¶1 Ahmed Hawken Rashid challenges his conviction for stalking. He contends the district court erred in rejecting his argument…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. DanielsUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. GarciaUtah Supreme Court · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lehi City v. RickabaughCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API