Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Transport Insurance Comp

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1992No. 91-436PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Paul Eastman appeals from the Workers’ Compensation Court’s determination that he did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that an August, 1981, injury caused his disability and from the order denying a new trial. We affirm.

We state the issues on appeal as follows:

1. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in concluding that the August, 1981, injury did not cause claimant’s disability?

2. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in denying the petition for new trial?

Paul Eastman (Eastman) was employed as a pick up and delivery driver for Garrett Freightlines (later ANR Freight Systems)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Carlson TransportMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wood v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Currey v. 10 Minute LubeMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Frost v. Anaconda Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hash v. Montana SilversmithMontana Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Giles v. Bozeman Public SchoolsMontana Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API