Horace Maxwell Goldfine v. United States of America
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant is a part owner, subject to a contract of sale hereafter referred to, of a piece of property in Boston known as the Little Building. Pursuant to a stipulation of appellant and others, appellees, receivers of his co-owner, a delinquent taxpayer, were authorized by the district court to sell the property as a unit. Their contract of sale to another appellee was confirmed by the court on June 19, 1963. Appellant was a party to the district court proceedings, but, making certain ready assumptions in his favor, through “excusable neglect” did not learn the full terms of the contract as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In the Matter of United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, MovantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
3Cited by11 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970
- Rhodes v. HoustonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1966
- United States v. ManosDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1972
- United States v. West Willow Apartments, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.