Legal Opinion

Horace Maxwell Goldfine v. United States of America

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 23, 1964No. 6251_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant is a part owner, subject to a contract of sale hereafter referred to, of a piece of property in Boston known as the Little Building. Pursuant to a stipulation of appellant and others, appellees, receivers of his co-owner, a delinquent taxpayer, were authorized by the district court to sell the property as a unit. Their contract of sale to another appellee was confirmed by the court on June 19, 1963. Appellant was a party to the district court proceedings, but, making certain ready assumptions in his favor, through “excusable neglect” did not learn the full terms of the contract as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, MovantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970
  3. Rhodes v. HoustonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1966
  4. United States v. ManosDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1972
  5. United States v. West Willow Apartments, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API