Legal Opinion
State v. Estill
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 2, 1993No. 92-KK-1295PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
614 So.2d 709 (1993)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Durrand ESTILL.
No. 92-KK-1295.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
March 2, 1993.
Anthony P. Lewis, Thibodaux, for applicant.
Richard P. Ieyoub, Atty. Gen., Walter Naquin Jr., Dist. Atty., Camille A. Morvant II, Asst. Dist. Atty., for respondent.
2Per curiam
The defendant is charged by grand jury indictment, returned on January 26, 1987, with distribution of marijuana in violation of La.R.S. 40:966. Following his arraignment on November 21, 1991, the defendant filed a motion to quash, contending that La.C.Cr.P. art. 578(2) barred trial of the case over two years after…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DrieverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. DevitoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- State v. AmarenaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. GrothSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- State v. SordenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. DillonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- State v. PetersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.