Legal Opinion

Chase & Taylor, Inc. v. Milam

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 24, 1986No. 71773Published

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The issue is whether OCGA § 43-40-24 (b) (formerly Ga. Code § 84-1404) permits a Georgia-licensed real estate broker to sue for a sales commission arising solely out of the acts of a sales agent who was licensed in a foreign state. The trial court, having construed the law to require the agent to be Georgia-licensed also, directed a verdict for defendants upon the application of the statute to those undisputed facts.

The undisputed facts are these: “[T]he sole agent, servant and employee for Plaintiff performing any real estate acts in this transaction was Mr. Lowell…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berchenko v. Fulton Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Krizan v. NEWMAN & COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Wanamaker v. Esther Wynne Realty Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API