Legal Opinion

Cronin v. Blaisdell

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 24, 1987No. 5740PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

In this appeal, the plaintiff avers as error the actions of the trial court (1) in admitting the testimony of a witness after the defendant failed to disclose the witness’ identity in response to the plaintiff’s request for interrogatories and production, (2) in admitting the medical report of a physician pursuant to General Statutes § 52-174 (b), (3) in admitting testimony that the plaintiff had made a claim for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident subsequent to the accident at issue in the present action, and (4) in refusing to set aside the jury’s verdict which the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  3. State v. BriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Camp v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  5. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mulrooney v. WamboltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Seperack v. SolazConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Pineau v. Home Depot, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API