Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1935No. 25340. En BancPublished

1DissentBlake, J.

(dissenting) — The decision in this case is supported by the authorities cited in the opinion. It is, therefore, not without much hesitation that I register a dissent. The question involved, however, is of such grave public importance that I am not only impelled to register a dissent, but to state at some length my reasons therefor.

Cow lake is a meandered body of water, almost entirely situated in section 27, township 22 N., E. 5, E. W. M., in King county. The respondent is the owner of a portion of lot 10, which is bounded on the southwesterly side by the meander line of the lake. In 1924,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Harrison v. FiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Griffith v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API