Smith v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentBlake, J.
(dissenting) — The decision in this case is supported by the authorities cited in the opinion. It is, therefore, not without much hesitation that I register a dissent. The question involved, however, is of such grave public importance that I am not only impelled to register a dissent, but to state at some length my reasons therefor.
Cow lake is a meandered body of water, almost entirely situated in section 27, township 22 N., E. 5, E. W. M., in King county. The respondent is the owner of a portion of lot 10, which is bounded on the southwesterly side by the meander line of the lake. In 1924,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Harrison v. FiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Griffith v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.