Briceno v. Williams
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Marcus D. BRICENO, Case No.: 16-cv-1665-JAH-AGS 4 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTED COUNSEL (ECF 105) 5 v. 6 Blake WILLIAMS, et al., 7 Defendants. 8 9 For the fourth time, plaintiff Marcus Briceno seeks appointed counsel. The last three 10 times, he sought counsel because of medical issues that he alleged interfered with his ability 11 to litigate his case and being “unlearned” in “the matters of law.” (See ECF 40, at 1.) This 12 time, he argues that his “PTSD-Anxiety-Depression” is “not allowing [him] to move on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Rivera-MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Price v. KramerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997