Legal Opinion

United States v. National Capital Storage & Moving Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 16, 1967No. Civ. No. 16510PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

The United States brought this action on its own behalf and on behalf of certain members of the Armed Forces, to have a distraint sale declared ineffective and unlawful insofar as it included household goods and personal effects of military personnel stored by the United States pursuant to 37 U.S.C.A. § 406(d) and regulations issued thereunder.1 Most of the personnel whose goods are involved in this case were either on assignment overseas or were in the process of returning from such assignments. The complaint sought delivery of the goods to the government and other…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Wallis v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boccardo v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
  2. Doe v. Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  3. United States v. B.C. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API