Legal Opinion

Chernow v. Chernow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated October 3, 2005, as denied his motion for leave to amend his answer to assert various counterclaims and granted that branch of the plaintiffs renewed motion which was for summary judgment on the first cause of action for specific performance.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof granting that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fulford v. Baker Perkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Koeth v. KoethAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Haller v. LopaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weiss v. FeldbrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Sau Ting Cheng v. Prime Design Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Chernow v. ChernowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Velez v. South Nine Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API