Legal Opinion

United Merchants and Manufacturers, Inc. v. R. A. Products Incorporated

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 5, 1968No. Patent Appeal 8002PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

R. A. Products seeks registration of “CONTACT” for “Plastic Gloves” under the “General Class- — Clothing.” United opposes on the conceded prior use and eleven registrations of “CONTACT” for piece goods, “CON-TACT” for various adhesive coated plastic materials, including flexible plastic sheeting for adhesive application to flat surfaces as a protective and decorative covering, and ‘"CON-TACT” combined with other terms for generally related goods.

It appears that United’s “CON-TACT” material has been sold throughout this country directly and through distributors to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Time Corporation v. Jacob Tennenbaum (Tennenbaum & Co., Telix Watch, Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carlisle Chemical Works, Inc. v. Hardman & Holden LimitedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Fotomat Corp. v. CochranDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1977
  3. In Re Research and Trading CorpCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Masterpiece of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Consolidated Novelty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  5. Key Chemicals, Inc. v. Kelite Chemicals Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API