Carlisle Chemical Works, Inc. v. Hardman & Holden Limited
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
Carlisle Chemical Works, Inc. (hereinafter appellant) appeals from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 157 USPQ 389, dismissing its consolidated oppositions to the applications of Hardman & Holden Limited (hereinafter appellee) to register the mark “COZIRC” for driers for paints and varnishes 1 and for chemical compounds of cobalt and zirconium used as catalytic oxidative driers in paints. 2
Appellant opposed registration in each instance on the basis of its ownership of the mark “ZIRCO” for catalytic agents used in the manufacture of drier compositions. 3 The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Florence Mfg. Co. v. J. C. Dowd & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Wincharger Corporation v. Rinco, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- United Merchants and Manufacturers, Inc. v. R. A. Products IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Formica Corporation v. The Newnan CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
3Cited by26 opinions
- McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Cesare v. WorkOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Koppers Co., Inc. v. Krupp-Koppers GmbHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- In Re Research and Trading CorpCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Coca-Cola Company v. CahillDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.