Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Schwarzkopf Technologies Corp. v. Ingersoll Cutting Tool Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 18, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 91-464-JJFPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are two motions. First, Plaintiff Schwarzkopf Technologies Corporation (Schwarzkopf) filed a Motion to Strike Ingersoll Cutting Tool Company’s (Ingersoll) Affirmative Defenses, or in the alternative, to Compel Deposition Testimony (Motion to Strike). Second, Ingersoll filed a Motion to Compel Production of a List of Withheld Documents. The Court held a hearing regarding these motions on May 28, 1992.

BACKGROUND

Schwarzkopf brought this patent infringement action alleging that Ingersoll has infringed U.S. Patent No. 4,101,703 (’703 patent)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
  4. Grinnell Corp. v. HackettDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A.K. Stamping Co. v. Instrument Specialties Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  2. Wilson v. LaknerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  3. Capek v. MendelsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Plant Genetic Systems, N.V. v. Northrup King Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997
  5. Burkel v. CragerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API