Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Chavez v. City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1997No. 16941Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

HARTZ, Chief Judge,

specially concurring in part and dissenting in part.

31. I concur in the result except that I would bar Plaintiffs claim that the hearing officer’s appointment violated the Open Meetings Act.

32. I agree with the majority that Plaintiffs breach-of-contraet claim is barred by the proceeding before the City’s personnel board. The legislature has authorized municipalities to enact merit system ordinances establishing grievance proceedings as the exclusive means for a municipal employee to claim that a job termination violated the employee’s contractual rights under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roberson v. Board of Education of City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Zamora v. Village of Ruidoso DownsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. AA Oilfield Service, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Sandia Savings and Loan Association v. KleinheimNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Alvarez v. County of BernalilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API