Legal Opinion

United States v. Santos Menendez Hernandez and Rigoberto Rosal

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1990No. 89-1538PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Following the denial of their motion to suppress the evidence of 4,500 pounds of marihuana found in their possession, defendants Santos Menendez Hernandez and Rigoberto Rosal were convicted by a jury of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute over 1,000 kilograms of marihuana and of possession with intent to distribute more than 1,000 kilograms of marihuana, both in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The defendants now argue that their convictions should be overturned based upon denial of their motion to suppress the evidence. Finding…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. Reginald James CauseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Ben Lee Basey, Armando Jose Lopez, and Oscar Quirarte Ponce, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Mateen Yusuf Shabazz, A/K/A Edward L. Eberhart, A/K/A Edward Wallace, and Keith Lamar ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. United States v. Ruben PereaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Leroy Roberson, Jr., Lonnie Keeper, and Lawanda WhitlockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Norman D. Wright, United States of America v. George W. Kirby, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API