Legal Opinion
Resteiner v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 16, 1997No. Docket 185069, 185116PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
In these consolidated cases, plaintiffs appeal as of right the circuit court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition dismissing all of plaintiffs’ claims against defendants. We affirm.
We concur and join in all portions of Judge White’s opinion except section vi. Regarding the issue of sanctions, we find that plaintiffs’ claims of appeal are not supported by any authority from Michigan, other jurisdictions, or recognized legal sources. As stated by defendant Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc., in the. introductory paragraph of its brief:
The trial court was entirely correct in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. Cunningham Drug Stores, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Buczkowski v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Scott v. Harper Recreation, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Dillon v. DeNooyer Chevrolet GeoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Cvengros v. Farm Bureau InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Laier v. KitchenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- BJ'S & SONS CONST. CO., INC. v. Van SickleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Leslie v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Keene v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.