Legal Opinion

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Alhadhood

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1996No. 95-50161PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying their motion to vacate default judgment on the basis of their sovereign immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”). The district court found that Defendants-Appellants made promises to Plaintiff-Appellee MCI Telecommunications Corporation (“MCI”) that qualified as commercial activity under the commercial activity exception of the FSIA, 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(2) because private parties would normally make such promises while participating in the market. We reverse based on our finding that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Foremost-Mckesson, Inc. v. The Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  5. Moran v. Kingdom of Saudi ArabiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vicky Hagen Colin L. Harris v. Sisseton-Wahpeton Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. EM Ltd. v. Republic of ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. Adler v. Federal Republic of NigeriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Fagot Rodriguez v. Republic of Costa RicaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001
  5. Adler v. NigeriaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API