Legal Opinion

James Jenkins v. Sanger Police Department, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 14, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00544Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES JENKINS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00544-KES-BAM 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST 13 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT OR NOTIFY COURT OF WILLINGNESS TO PROCEED 14 SANGER POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., ON COGNIZABLE CLAIM 15 Defendants. (Doc. 1) 16 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff James Jenkins (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and state law. Plaintiff’s signed complaint, filed May 20 8, 2025, is currently…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API