Legal Opinion

Borgen v. Wiglesworth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 13, 1959No. 41,441PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This is an action for injunctive relief. Defendants attempt to appeal from adverse rulings hereafter mentioned.

The facts as disclosed by the pleadings and written stipulation, and the procedural aspects of the case, will be summarized briefly.

Plaintiffs owned a tract of land in Lawrence and leased it to defendants who, under the terms of the written lease, were to construct a building adapted to and to be used for the washing and servicing of automobiles. The lease provided that the building was to revert to plaintiffs upon expiration…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dolan Mercantile Co. v. Wholesale Grocery SubscribersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Salt City Building, Loan & Savings Ass'n v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Mundell v. FranseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Curtis v. Kansas Bostwick Irrigation District No. 2Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reno Newspapers, Inc. v. BibbNevada Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Borgen v. WiglesworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. Borgen v. WiglesworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  4. Walta v. Bayer Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API