State v. Hyman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Justice.
*159 **364 The question before us in this case is whether the record supports the trial court's decision to deny defendant's motion for appropriate relief. After carefully considering the record in light of the applicable law, we hold that, while the claim asserted in defendant's motion for appropriate relief is not subject to the procedural bar established by N.C.G.S. § 15A-1419(a)(3), the trial court did not err by denying defendant's motion for appropriate relief for the reasons stated by the Court of Appeals. As a result, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, in part;…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. FairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. HymanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- In re Z.M.T.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
- In re Z.M.T.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.