Legal Opinion

State v. Hyman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 2018No. COA16-398-2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

*312 Previously, a divided panel of this Court, --- N.C. App. ----, 797 S.E.2d 308 (2017) ( Hyman III ), held that the exculpatory-witness component of defendants' ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim was not procedurally barred from appellate review and that "defendant is entitled to relief under Strickland on [that component of his] claim" and, therefore, reversed the trial court's order denying defendant's motion for appropriate relief ("MAR"). Id. at ----, 797 S.E.2d at 322 . The majority thus declined to "address [defendant's] remaining arguments," id. , which included…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. FairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  5. West v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
  2. State v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  3. US Right to Know v. The Univ. of N.C. at Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API