State v. Hyman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ELMORE, Judge.
*312 Previously, a divided panel of this Court, --- N.C. App. ----, 797 S.E.2d 308 (2017) ( Hyman III ), held that the exculpatory-witness component of defendants' ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim was not procedurally barred from appellate review and that "defendant is entitled to relief under Strickland on [that component of his] claim" and, therefore, reversed the trial court's order denying defendant's motion for appropriate relief ("MAR"). Id. at ----, 797 S.E.2d at 322 . The majority thus declined to "address [defendant's] remaining arguments," id. , which included…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. FairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
- West v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
- State v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
- US Right to Know v. The Univ. of N.C. at Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026