Legal Opinion

Niesner v. Kusch

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1986No. B014207PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

Plaintiff, Elisabeth Niesner, appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered upon an order made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 583, subdivision (b), 1 for failure to bring the action to trial within five years after filing the action. The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether the five-year period of section 583, subdivision (b), was tolled during the period of time the case remained submitted to arbitration during the last six months prior to the expiration of the five-year statute, even though the case never had an arbitration hearing, but was in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Weeks v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Salas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Rice v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Landry v. Berryessa Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Jackson v. GarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Winston v. WoodwardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API