Legal Opinion
Ulster Oil Transport Corp. v. the Matton No. 20. the Petroleum No. 7. the Carutica
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 25, 1954No. 18, Docket 22726Published
1Opinion of the Court
210 F.2d 106
ULSTER OIL TRANSPORT CORP.
v.
THE MATTION NO. 20. THE PETROLEUM NO. 7. THE CARUTICA.
No. 18, Docket 22726.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued Dec. 10, 1953.
Decided Jan. 25, 1954.
Mahar & Mason, New York City (Frank C. Mason, New Yrok City, of counsel), for claimant-appellant.
Galli & Locker, New York City (Warner Pyne, and Vincent J. Ryan, Babylon, N.Y., of counsel), for claimant-appellee Motor Vessel Carutica.
Macklin, Speer, Hanan & McKernan, New York City (Martin J. McHugh, New York City, of counsel), for libellants-appellees.
Before CHASE, Chief Judge, and L. HAND…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- The Victory & the PlymothianSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.