Legal Opinion

Feingold v. Malone

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided May 25, 2001No. 1348Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, J.,

INTRODUCTION

Dora Feingold and Allen L. Feingold, plaintiffs, argue on appeal that the preliminary objection challenging venue and requesting a transfer of the case to Montgomery County, filed by Janet Malone, defendant, was erroneously sustained. This motion judge disagrees.

RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Upon review of the complaint, preliminary objection, and the response to the preliminary objection, the following facts were considered by this motion judge when sustaining defendant’s preliminary objection:

“Plaintiffs, attorneys by profession, are husband and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Salay v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Kubik v. Route 252, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Masel v. GlassmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Shears v. RigleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. In re D.L.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API