Legal Opinion
People v. Herrnkind
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]; People v Conway, 6 NY3d 869, 872 [2006]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. RagsdaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. CrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. OliverNew York Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- People v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025