United States v. Worrall
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
2 U.S. 384 (____)
2 Dall. 384
THE UNITED STATES
versus
WORRALL.
Supreme Court of United States.
On these facts, M. Levy, for the defendant.
The Attorney of the District (Rawle) replied.
BY THE COURT: The letter appears by its date to have been written in Pennsylvania; and it is actually delivered by the defendant at a post office in Pennsylvania. The writing and the delivery at the Post-Office (thus putting it in the way to be delivered to Mr. Coxe) must be considered, in effect, as one act; and, as far as respects the defendant, it is consummated within the jurisdiction of the Court. We,…
2Cited by54 opinions
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. Roy W. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Washington Legal Foundation v. United States Sentencing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- In Re PalliserSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.