Legal Opinion
Harold D. Curry and Magdalene Curry v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 14, 1985No. 84-2650PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.
These two hardworking taxpayers of modest combined income have gotten themselves into an unusual tax fix which we cannot remedy for them.
Harold Curry worked at a truck terminal, his wife Magdalene as a secretary; together they earned about $25,000 a year. In order to supplement their salaries they opened their own part-time business on the side. This business, known as [¶] Curry Truck and Tire Repair, offered emergency service to those suffering flat tires. A job ticket was prepared for each tire repaired. From time to time the Currys sent their customers…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Laing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hutchinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Robert F. Koch and Evelyn C. Koch v. Donald C. Alexander, Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Orris C. Ruth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- William K. Vancanagan, in His Capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ford Bovey, and Sharon Bovey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Lucy Freck, A/K/A Lucy Cameron v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Larson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Emanuel Weisbart v. United States Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.