Legal Opinion

Best v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 3, 2009No. 07-2765PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal we must determine the preclusive effect in a federal civil suit of the denial of a suppression motion in an earlier Indiana state criminal case that never reached the merits of the criminal charges. The denial of the suppression motion was affirmed in an interlocutory appeal, but the affirmance was followed by a motion in the trial court to reconsider based on new evidence. The trial court never ruled on that second motion because the government dismissed the prosecution. Applying Indiana law, as we must under 28 U.S.C. § 1738, we hold that the denial of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Chavez v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. David Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Russian Media Group, LLC v. Cable America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Nationwide Agribusiness Insura v. Toni DuganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Costello v. GrundonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. William Gerhartz v. David RichertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API