Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sammons Enterprises, Inc. v. Manley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1977No. 19310Published

1DissentAkin, Justice

I cannot agree with the majority’s holding that the judgment continues to bear interest at the rate prescribed by the statute in effect on the date of judgment. The majority rests its holding on the case of Missouri Pac. Ry. v. Patton, 35 S.W. 477 (Tex. Civ. App., 1896, writ ref’d). As noted in the majority opinion, the refusal of the writ indicates approval of the result, but not necessarily the rationale. In Watkins v. Junker, 90 Tex. 584, 40 S.W. 11, 12 (1897), the supreme court addressed a similar question concerning prejudgment interest. In Junker, the court stated that interest is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Watkins v. JunkerTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Morley v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Noe v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Missouri & Arkansas Lumber & Mining Co. v. Greenwood DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. International-Great Northern R. Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API