Legal Opinion

Berry v. Girard

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 2, 1974Published

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

Unlike the usual workmen’s compensation case which comes before us, there is no dispute here but that Kenneth Berry, Jr., received a personal injury in the course of his employment and arising out of his employment.

He is entitled by law to workmen’s compensation by his employer’s insurance carrier and is receiving such compensation. Most of his claimed medical expenses have been paid and are not in issue.

*306The case comes to us because the Industrial Accident Commission ruled • that only a portion of a bill for services rendered by a chiropractor who treated the employee is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hester v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Stephens v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Simon v. Hospital Service Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Harris v. OsorioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API