Legal Opinion

Hester v. Ford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 9, 1930No. 8 Div. 192PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

Plaintiff, W. O. Hester, on jumping from a runaway' wagon, received what is known in surgery -as a Pott’s fracture at and near the ankle joint.

The defendant, Dr. L. H. Ford, is sued for negligent or unskillful treatment of the injury, to plaintiff’s damage.

Count 2 charges that “defendant negligently failed to use in and about the said diagnosis and treatment of plaintiff’s, injury reasonable care,” “skill,” or “diligence.” (Italics supplied.)

Count 4 charges “defendant failed to use in and about said diagnosis of plaintiff’s ankle” such “care,” “skill,” or “diligence” “as was reasonably…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hughes v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Robinson v. State Ex Rel. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Hamrick v. ShippSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Petty v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Steele v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Foodtown Stores, Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. State v. LingmanUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Lucito v. Louisiana Hospital Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API