Pratt v. St. Christopher's Hospital
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtDel Sole, P.J.
¶ 1 Sharon Pratt and Michael Nesmith, Sr., appeal following the denial of their post-trial motions and the entry of a judgment in favor of Appellees/defendants. Upon review, we remand for further proceedings.
¶ 2 The trial court aptly summarized the factual history of this case as follows:
The child, Michael Nesmith, Jr., ... then six months old, was hospitalized at [defendant] St. Christopher’s Hospital on August 10, 1989 due to a high fever and a full fontanelle (a bulging of the anterior of his forehead). A spinal tap, ordered and performed almost immediately after admission, ruled out…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carter v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Friedman v. Ralph Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Pittsburgh National Bank v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Slappo v. J's Development Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Stalsitz v. Allentown HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MessersmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Pratt v. St. Christopher's HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Com., Dept. of Gen. Serv. v. Min. Prod.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. PopeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.