Legal Opinion

Pratt v. St. Christopher's Hospital

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDel Sole, P.J.

¶ 1 Sharon Pratt and Michael Nesmith, Sr., appeal following the denial of their post-trial motions and the entry of a judgment in favor of Appellees/defendants. Upon review, we remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2 The trial court aptly summarized the factual history of this case as follows:

The child, Michael Nesmith, Jr., ... then six months old, was hospitalized at [defendant] St. Christopher’s Hospital on August 10, 1989 due to a high fever and a full fontanelle (a bulging of the anterior of his forehead). A spinal tap, ordered and performed almost immediately after admission, ruled out…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Friedman v. Ralph Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Pittsburgh National Bank v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Slappo v. J's Development Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Stalsitz v. Allentown HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MessersmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Pratt v. St. Christopher's HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Com., Dept. of Gen. Serv. v. Min. Prod.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. PopeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API