Legal Opinion

State v. . Beam

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

CeimiNAL action, tried before Shaw, J., at January Term, 1920, of Iredell.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Tbe defendant was indicted for selling liquor and for baying liquor for sale. There was evidence as to the sale of the liquor and of its possession for the purpose of sale at Morrow’s Grove camp meeting the first Sunday of August, 1919. In order to sbow tbat the defendant bad the liquor in bis possession for sale the State proposed to prove tbat a year before the time of tbis transaction the defendant bad liquor in bis possession, and sold the same to several persons. Tbis evidence was admitted, and the defendant excepted. Tbe ruling was erroneous. When offenses are so connected witb, or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . StancillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. State v. . MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Gray v. . CartwrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. State v. . WinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. . BeamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. State v. . DeadmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API