Long v. Daylor
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Barnes,
The plaintiff sued in assumpsit for damages, alleging a breach of a written contract, for the sale to him, of the premises known as 1930 N. Third Street, Harrisburg. Title to the premises was in defendant Shutter. The co-defendant Daylor was Shutter’s agent in negotiating the sale, and apparently had some interest in the property.
The facts in reference to the terms of payment of the purchase price for the property are somewhat confusing. It appears from the agreement dated August 7, 1933, that the full consideration was $6,250. Plaintiff agreed to assume an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Siegfried v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Reznor Manufacturing Co. v. Bessemer & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Bennett v. ErwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. Schuylkill Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- McGunnegle v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. Lumbermen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Evans v. MoffatSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Matosantos Commercial Corp. v. Applebee's International, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Matosantos Commercial Corp. v. Applebee's International, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Evans v. MoffatSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957