Legal Opinion

Boykins v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1984No. 4-1282A389PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Judge.

Roger Dale Boykins appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, by which he sought to set aside his earlier pleas of guilty to theft and burglary. He contends the post-conviction court erred in finding these pleas were entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.

We reverse.

The state admits that the court accepting Boykins' guilty pleas did not give him the statutory advisements required by IND.CODE 385-4.1-1-8 (now codified at IND.CODE 35-85-1-2 (1982)). Absent these advisements, we must find that Boy-kins did not enter his guilty pleas knowingly,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. German v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Twyman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Frazier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. DercachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woodford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ware v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Boykins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Woodford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API