Duncan v. Dick
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Brief of Griffith & Quitman.
1 H. Bl. 685, 689; 6 Broun, P. C. 550. — Balfour vs. Scott. — In this case it was determined that in the case of a Scotchman dying intestate domiciled in England, his personal estate must be distributed according to the law of England; and moreover,'even when by the law of Scot land an heir would be obliged to collate, before he could claim a part of the personal estate; this would not be the case where the intestate had his domicil in England.
2 Bos. & Pul. 229; 566. — Bruce vs. Bruce. — In this case which has since become a leading one it was established that in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dawes v. BoylstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
- M'Donald v. MortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1805
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1877