Frederick v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
No question is raised as to the amount due plaintiff. The only questions presented are as to the right of the plaintiff to recover interest and costs.(1) Claims against the State do not bear interest “unless its consent to pay interest has been manifested by an act of its legislature, or by a lawful contract of its executive officers.” Schlesinger v. State, 195 Wis. 366, 368, 218 N. W. 440. There is neither a statute nor a contract imposing such liability in this case.(2) No costs can be taxed against the State unless authorized by statute. Baxter v. State, 10 Wis. 454, 457. But ch. 285 of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schlesinger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Baxter v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frankenthal v. Wisconsin Real Estate Brokers' BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Klingseisen v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Kathleen Papa v. DHSWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Holton & Hunkel Greenhouse Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.