Legal Opinion

Hilo Sugar Co. v. Tucker

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Submission on Agreed Facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Dole, J.

It does not appear from the record how this cause has reached the Court in Banco, but it was argued before us under an undoubted mutual understanding of both sides. The following agreed statement of facts and issues of law was submitted by counsel of both parties.

The Hilo Sugar Company is lessee of various tracts of land, containing in all an area of 1288 acres, under covenant to pay taxes. The Hilo Sugar Company returned these lands for taxation by name at the same rates per acre as their fee simple lands of similar nature, viz., Fifteen dollars ($15) per acre…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phelps v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re the Tax Appeal of Grayco Land Escrow, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Wilder v. ColburnHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In re Assessment of Taxes, Hawaiian Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  5. In Re Taxes Maui Agricultural Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API