Legal Opinion

Raymond Andrew Simmons v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided July 3, 1997No. 03-96-00243-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-96-00243-CR

Raymond Andrew Simmons, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. A-94-0039-S, HONORABLE DICK ALCALA, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Raymond Andrew Simmons appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of possessing less than twenty-eight grams of methamphetamine, a controlled substance. Controlled Substances Act, 71st Leg., R.S., ch. 678, sec. 1, § 481.115, 1989 Tex. Gen. Laws 2230, 2936-37 (Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115, since amended). The jury…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Hackleman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API