Legal Opinion

Matlin v. Crescent Commercial Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1949No. Civ. 16724PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by defendant Crescent Commercial Corporation from a judgment for plaintiffs in an action in which each plaintiff sought a cancellation of a contract and the recovery of monies deposited with defendant pursuant to a contract entered into between him and defendant.

In 1946, 1947, and the early part of 1948, there was a decided shortage of beer for sale in the Los Angeles area. In March of 1946, the defendant corporation (Crescent) entered into an agreement with a Wisconsin brewing company to take over its entire output of 520 premium beer, an eastern beer. Immediately thereafter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. AbelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Sweet v. HamilothorisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Moore v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Estate of PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Goss v. FanoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Miller v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Alles v. HippCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API