Reynolds v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
Thomas Reynolds appeals his convictions after a jury trial for criminal recklessness, a class D felony, and criminal deviate conduct, a class B felony, for which he received concurrent sentences of two and twelve years respectively. He asserts that his convictions which rest upon repudiated Patterson statements are not supported by sufficient evidence. We agree and therefore reverse and remand with instructions that the trial court enter judgments of acquittal for both convictions.
FACTS
Reynolds' convictions arise out of two entirely unrelated incidents. Count I of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Patterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Watkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Fox v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Vuncannon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Peckinpaugh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Al-Saud v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Warren v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Van Donk v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Meek v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- D.B. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.