Fox v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHIELDS, Judge.
Appellants were tried by a jury and convicted of first degree arson. I.C.1971, 35-16-1-1 (Burns Code Ed.). Because we find the evidence insufficient to support the convictions of Fox, Havens, York, and Perry, and that reversible error was committed as to Kapp, we will discuss only those issues necessary to the disposition of this appeal or likely to appear upon Kapp’s retrial.
I
We consider first appellants’ argument that the burned building was not “part or parcel of a dwelling house.”
The statute under which appellants were charged and convicted is I.C. 35-16-1-1, which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reid v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Beatrice Martinez Delgado and Gilbert Hernandez Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Bobbitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. NowackMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MoritzOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Short v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. Fannon, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Athens County2018
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.