Legal Opinion

Minnesota Twins Partnership v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 31, 1998No. C6-98-409PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

This case involves determining whether the Minnesota Twins Partnership’s (Twins) purchases of ticket stock and novelty items were purchases for resale. The Twins argue that the baseball club resells those items to baseball game attendees and thus the purchases of the items are exempt from sales or use tax. The Minnesota Tax Court found that the items were given away rather than resold to the attendees. The tax court therefore held that the Twins’ purchases of the items were not purchases for resale and that the Twins were responsible for the tax on the items. We affirm.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball ClubWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. F-D Oil Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Questar Data Systems, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Weigel v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A&H VENDING CO. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Interstate Traffic Signs, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Greenwood Gaming v. Commonwealth, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API