Legal Opinion

Skinner & Mounce Co. v. Waite

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho

Decided July 15, 1907No. 383PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On Motion to Quash and Vacate Service of Summons.

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, District Judge.

The defendant Waite never resided in the state of Idaho, but at all times referred to in the record was a resident of the city of Portland, in the state of Oregon. He owned real estate in Nez Perce county, Idaho, the title to which he conveyed to the • defendant Burns as security for a loan. This suit was commenced in the state district court of Nez Perce county to recover from the defendants $2,500 alleged to be due to the plaintiff on account of commission for the sale of this real estate. No service was made on Burns. Waite, having been served with process in Nez…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hale v. WhartonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1896
  2. Atchison v. MorrisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1882
  3. Morrow v. DudleyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Lyell v. GoodwinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1845
  5. Kauffman v. KennedyUnited States Circuit Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lane v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Kaufman v. GarnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1909
  3. Dwelle v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1912
  4. Feister v. HulickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Roschynialski v. HaleDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API