Legal Opinion
SEB SA v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 23, 1999No. 99 Civ. 9284(BDP)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff, SEB S.A. (“SEB”) commenced this action against Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., Global-Tech Appliances, Inc., and Pentalpha Enterprises Ltd., claiming that a deep fryer, marketed by Montgomery Ward and manufactured by Global-Tech, infringes United States Patent No. 4,995,312 (the “’312 Patent”). See 35 U.S.C. § 271.
SEB moved by Order to Show Cause on September 10, 1999 for a preliminary injunction. Montgomery Ward appeared and opposed the motion, while Global-Tech and Pentalpha challenged the existence of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- SEB SA v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- SEB, SA v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Pentalpha Enterprises, Ltd. v. Cooper & Dunham LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Outside the Box Innovations, LLC v. Travel Caddy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.