Legal Opinion

Christie v. Bowne

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from circuit court, Queens county. Action by Daniel E. Christie against Bobert Bowne. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBbown, P. J.

The plaintiff brought this action as a creditor of the corporation known as the Néw. York Advertising Agency, Limited, to recover his debt from the defendant, who was a stock*391holder in said corporation, on the ground of the failure to file in the office of the county cleric the certificate of the full payment of the capital stock of said corporation, as required by section 37, c. 611, Laws 1875, under which statute the corporation was organized. The question discussed by the appellant requires only a brief notice. No exception presents the question as to the proper construction of the peculiar…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. Mail & Exp. Pub. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thacher v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API