Tidd v. New York Central Rd.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
The evidence presented by the record to the Court of Appeals and to this court is very brief. Besides the exhibits and photographs depicting the scene of the accident, the evidence consists only of the testimony of Karr, the owner and driver of the tractor, and of Tidd, the plaintiff in the action. Both were farmers living not far from the crossing and well acquainted with it.
Karr was the owner of a Ford tractor, equipped with a single seat for driving. His house was approximately twenty-four rods from the railway crossing, but his farm lay on both sides of the crossing. On the morning of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hocking Valley Ry. Co. v. WykleOhio Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Washington Nat. Ins. Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Jernigan v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Bratton v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Smith v. Toledo & Ohio Central Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- Wright v. Beacon Mutual Indemnity Co.Pickaway County Court of Common Pleas · 1961