Hocking Valley Ry. Co. v. Wykle
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The grounds of claimed error prejudicial to the rights of the plaintiff in error are as follows: (1) Refusal of the trial court to give to the jury before argument the instructions requested; (2) error in permitting certain witnesses to state that they could have heard the whistle or bell had the same been sounded; and (3) error in the general charge.
The first requested instruction which the coqrt re fused to give, presenting the same in their logical order, was the request for a directed verdict in favor of the defendant. This requested instruction, just as did the motion theretofore made at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marchetti v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Smith v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Carnegie v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. FaubionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by19 opinions
- Shinaver v. SzymanskiOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
- Eskovitz v. BergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. LungOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.